SEVENTH SECTION
PARTICULAR OBLIGATIONS
FIRST TITLE
Sale. Exchange
I. GENERAL PROVISIONs
§ 433. [Basic duties of the seller and the
buyer]
(1)
Bythecontractofsalethesellerofathingisboundtodeliverthethingtothe
purchaser and to transfer ownership of the thing. The seller of a
right is bound to transfer the right to the purchaser, and if the
right entitles one to the possession of a thing to deliver the
thing.
(2) The purchaser is bound to pay to the seller the purchase
price agreed upon and to take delivery of the thing purchased.
§ 434. [Warranty against defects in titfe]
The seller is bound to transfer to the purchaser the object sold
free from rights enforceable by third parties against the pu
rchaser.
§ 435. [Defects in title of pieces of land]
(1) The seller of a piece of land or of a right over a piece of
land is bound to procure at his own expense the cancellation of
non-existent rights entered in the Land Register, if they would,
in case of their existence, injure the right to be transferred to
the purchaser.
(2) The same applies to the rights entered in the ship register
in the case of the sale of a registered ship or of a ship under
construction or of a ship mortgage.
§ 436. [Public burdens on pieces of land]
The seller of a piece of land does not warrant the land to be
free from public taxes and other public burdens which are not
appropriate for entry in the Land Register.
§ 437. (Warranty in case of purchase of a
right]
(1) The seller of a claim or any other right warrants the legal
existence of the claim or of the right.
(2) The seller of a security warrants that it has not been called
in for cancellation.
§ 438. (Warranty of solvency] If the seller
of a claim warrants the solvency of the debtor, the warranty
shall, in case of doubt, refer only to solvency at the date of
assignment.
§ 439. (Purchaser's knowledge of defects in
title]
(1) The seller is not responsible for a defect in title, if the
purchaser knows of the defect at the time of the sale.
(2) The seller shall extinguish any mortgages, land charge,
annuity charge, ship mortgage or right of pledge with which the
object sold is charged, even if the purchaser knows of their
existence. The same applies to a recorded notation to secure the
claim for registering one of these rights.
§ 440. [Rights of the purchaser]
(1) If the seller does not fulfill the obligations imposed upon
him by §§ 433 to 437, 439, the rights of the purchaser are
determined according to the provisions of §§ 320 to 327.
(2) I f a movable has been sold and delivered to the pu rchaser
for the pu rpose of transfer of ownership, the purchaser may not
demand compensation for nonperformance on account of the right of
a third party involving the possession of the thing, unless he
has delivered the thing to the third party in consideration of
his right, or has returned it to the seller, or unless the thing
has been destroyed.
(3) It is equivalent to delivery of the thing to the third party,
if the third party becomes heir to the purchaser, or if the
purchaser acquires the right of the third party in any other
manner, or buys out the third party.
(4) If the purchaser has a claim for deliverv against another
person, the assignment of the claim is sufficient in lieu of the
return of the thing.
§ 441 . [Further rights of the purchaser]
The provisions of § 440(2) to (4) apply even if a right in a
movable involving the possession of the thing has been sold.
§ 442. [Burden of proof of defect in titleJ
If a seller disputes a defect in title asserted by the purchaser,
the purchaser must prove the defect.
§ 443. [Contractual exclusion of warranty]
An agreement whereby the obligation of warranty of title imposed
upon the seller by §§ 433 to 437, 439 to 442, is released or
limited is void, if the seller fraudulently conceals the defect.
§ 444. [Duty to give information] The
seller is bound to give to the purchaser all necessary
information concerning the legal relationshi ps affecting the
object sold, in particular, in the case of the sale of a piece of
land, concerning the boundaries, privileges and burdens; and to
deliver to him all documents serving as evidence of the right
insofar as they are in his possession. If the contents of such a
document relate also to other matters, the seller is bound to
give only a publicly certified extract.
§ 451 . [Passing of risk of ownership and
costs when a right is purchased] I f a right to a thing is sold,
which involves the possession of the thing, the provisions of
§§ 446 to 450 apply mutatis mutandis.
§ 452. [Interest on the cost price] The
purchaser is bound to pay interest on the purchase price from the
date at which the emoluments of the purchased object accrue to
him, unless the purchase price is payable at a fixed time.
§ 453. [Market price] If the market price
is specified as the pu rchase price, in case of doubt the normal
market price at the place and time of performance is deemed to be
the price agreed upon.
§ 454. [Exclusion of the right of
rescission] If the seller has carried out the contract and has
fixed a time for payment of the purchase price, he does not have
the right of rescission specified in § 325(2) and § 326.
§ 455. [Retention of title] If the seller
of a movable has retained title until payment of the pu rchase
price, it is to be presumed, in case of doubt, that the transfer
of title takes place subject to the condition precedent of
payment in full of the purchase price, and that the seller is
entitled to rescind the contract if the purchaser is in default
with the payment.
§ 456. [Excluded buyers in case of
compulsory execution] At a sale under compulsory execution the
person charged with making or conducting the sale and the
assistants employed bv him, including the registrar, are not
permitted to purchase the object put up for sale, either for
themselves personally or through another, or as representative of
another.
§ 457. [Excluded buyers in cases of sale of
pledged objects] The provision of § 456 applies also to a sale
other than under compulsorv execution, if the authorization to
sell has been given by virtue of a provision of law empowering
the person giving the authorization to cause the object to be
sold on account of another, in particular, in the cases of a sale
of a pledged object and of a sale permitted by §§ 383, 385; and
also to a sale by a trustee in bankruptry.
§ 458. [Purchase despite prohibition of
purchase](1) The validity of a purchase made in contravention of
the provisions of §§ 456, 457, and of the transfer of the
purchased object, depends upon the consent of the persons
interested in the sale as debtor, owner, or creditor. If the
purchaser requires an interested party to declare whether or not
he will ratify, the provisions of § 177(2) apply mutatis
mutandis.
(2) If, in consequence of a refusal to ratify, a new sale is
made, the former purchaser shall be responsible for the costs of
the new sale and also for any deficiency.
WARRANTY AGAINST DEFECTS IN THE GOODS
§ 459. [Liability for defect of quality]
(1 ) The seller of a thing warrants the purchaser that, at the
time when the risk passes to the purchaser, it is free from
defects which diminish or destroy its value or fitness for its
ordinary use, or the use provided for in the contract. An
insignificant diminution in value or fitness is not taken into
consideration.
(2) The Seller also warrants that, at the time the risk passes,
the thing has the promised qualities.
§ 460. [Knowledge of the purchaser] A
seller is not responsible for a defect in the thing sold if the
purchaser knew of the defect at the time of entering into the
contract. If a defect of the kind specified in ~ 459(1) has
remained unknown to the purchaser in consequence of gross
negligence, the seller is responsible only if he has fraudulently
concealed it, unless he has guaranteed that the thing is free
from defect.
§ 461 . [Sale of a pledge] A seller is not
responsible for a defect in the thing sold if it is sold by
public auction under the law of pledge and designated as a
pledge.
§ 462. [Cancellation; reduction] On account
of a defect for which the seller is responsible under the
provisions of §§ 459, 460, the purchaser may demand annulment
of the sale (cancellation), or reduction of the purchase price
(reduction).
§ 463. [Compensation for non-performance]
If a promised quality in the thing sold was absent at the time of
the purchase, the purchaser may demand compensation for
non-performance, instead of cancellation or reduction. The same
applies if the seller has fraudulently concealed a defect.
§ 464. [Reservation on acceptance] If the
purchaser accepts a defedive thing although he knows of the
defect, he is entitled to the claims specified in §§ 462, 463,
only if on acceptance he reserves his rights on account of the
defed.
§ 465. [Execution of cancellation or
reduction] Cancellation or reduction is effected if the seller,
on demand by the purchaser, declares his consent thereto.
§ 466. [Expiration of period for
cancellation] If the purchaser asserts against the seller a
defect of quality, the seller may offer cancellation and require
him to declare within a fixed reasonable period whether he
demands cancellation. In such a case cancellation may be demanded
only before the expiration of the period.
§ 467. [Execution of cancellation] The
provisions of §~ 346 to 348, 350 to 354, 356, applicable to the
contractual right of rescission apply muiatis mufandis to
cancellation; in the case provided for by g 352, however
cancellation is permitted if the defect has not been discovered
until the remodelling of the thing. The seller shall also
reimburse the purchaser for the expenses of the contract.
§ 468.
[Warrantyofthesizeofpieceofland]Ifthesellerofapieceoflandpromises
the purchasercertain specified dimensions, he is responsiblefor
the dimensions as for a promised quality. The purchaser may,
however· demand cancellation on account of the absence of the
promised dimensions only if the deficiency is so considerable
that the fulfillment of the contract is of no interest to him.
BOOK 2 § 535-540
THIRD TITLE
Lease. Usufructuary Lease
LEASE
§ 535. [Essence of the contract of lease]
By a contract of lease the lessor is bound to give to the lessee
the use of the leased thing du ring the term of the lease. The
lessee is bound to pay to the lessor the rent agreed upon.
§ 536. [Duties of the lessor]The lessor
shall hand over the leased thing to the lessee in a condition
appropriate for the use stipu lated, and shall keep it in such
condition during the term of the lease.
§ 537. [Defects in the leased thing]
(1) If the leased thing is, at the time of handing over to the
lessee, affected with a defect which destroys or diminishes its
fitness for the stipulated use, or if such a defect arises during
the term of the lease, the lessee is released from payment of the
rent for the time du ri ng which its fitness is destroyed; for
the time duringwhich its fitness is diminished he is bound to pay
only a part of the rent to be calculated according to §§ 4~,
473. An insignificant diminution in fitness is not taken into
consideration.
(2) Sent. (1) also applies if a warranted quality is absent or
disappears subsequently. In the letting of a piece of land the
warranty of specified dimensions is equivalent to the warranty of
a quality.
(3) I n the case of a lease of living accommodation, an agreement
varying this to the prejudice of the lessee, is ineffective.
§ 538. [Lessor's duty to compe~uate]
(1) If a defect of the kind specified in § 537 exists at the
time of entering into the contract, or if such a defect arises
subsequently in consequence of a circumstance for which the
lessor is responsible, or if the lessor is in default in respect
of the removal of a defect, the lessee may demand compensation
for the nonfulfillment, without prejudice to the rights specified
in § 537.
(2) If the lessor is in default the lessee may himself remove the
defect and demand compensation for any necessary outlays.
§ 539. [Lessee's knowledge of defect] If
the lessee knew of the defect of the leased thing at the time of
entering into the contrad, the rights specified in §§ 537, 538
do not belong to him. If a defect of the kind specified in §
537(1) remains unknown to the lessee in consequence of gross
negligence, or if he accepts a defective thing although he knows
of the defect, he may enforce these rights only under the
conditions under which warranty is given to the purchaser of a
defective thing as provided in §§ 460, 464.
§ 540. [Contractual exclusion of warranty]
An agreement, whereby the obligation of the lessor as to
responsibility for defects of title or quality in the leased
thing is released or limited, is void if the lessor fraudulently
conceals the defect.
The notice also 6ecomes ineffective if up to the moment of
expiration of one month after the pendency of the claim for
eviction on the grounds of the rent due and the compensation due
under § SSi(1), sent. 2, the lessor is paid, or an official
agency takes the payment upon itself. This does not apply if less
than two years before the notice it was preceded by a notice
ineffective under sent. 1.
An agreement varying this, to the prejudice of the lessee, is
ineffective.
§ 554a. [Irnmediate notice where
continuation of lease cannot be expected] A lease of
accommodation can be terminated without observance of the term of
notice if one party wilfully breaches his obligations in such a
way, in particular, constantly disturbing the peace of the
dwelling, that it cannot be expected of the other party to
continue the lease. An agreement to the contrary is void.
§ 554b.
[Agreementaboutimmediatenotice]Anagreement,underwhichthelessor of
living accommodation has the right to give notice without
observance of a term of notice, on other grounds than those
enumerated in the law, is ineffective.
§ 556. [Return of leased thing]
(1) The lessee is bound to return the leased thing after the
termination of the lease.
(2) The lessee of a piece of land has no right of lien on account
of his claims against the lessor.
(3) If the lessee has transferred the use of the thing to a third
party, the lessor may, after the termination of the lease, demand
the return of the thing even from the third party.
§ 556a. (Lessee's opposition to notice]
(1) The lessee can oppose the giving of notice of termination of
a lease of living accommodation, and demand from the lessor the
continuation of the lease, if the contractual termination of the
lease would mean a hardship for the lessee or his family, which
would be unjustified even in the light of the legitimate
interests of the lessor. A hardship also exists if adequate
alternative accommodation cannot be given under acceptable
conditions. In evaluating the lessor's legitimate interests only
those grounds stated in the written notice under
§ 564a(1) sent. 2 may be taken into
consideration, unless the grounds have ar9sen thereafter.
(2) In the event of (1) the lessee can demand that the lease be
continued for as long as is appropriate, taking all circumstances
into consideration. If the lessee cannot be expected to continue
the lease under the currently applicable contractual conditions,
the lessee may demand only that the lease be continued under an
appropriate alteration of the conditions.
(3) If no agreement is possible, a judgment will provide for the
continuation of the lease and its du ration, as well as the terms
under which it will be continued. If it is uncertain at what time
the circumstances, on the ground of which the termination of the
lease can be considered a hardship for the lessee or his family,
will disappear, it can be stipulated that the lease will be
continued for an unlimited period.
FIFTH TITLE
Loan
§ 607. [Essence of loanJ
(1) A person who has received money or other fungibles as a loan
is bound to return to the lender what he has received in things
of the same kind, quality and q uantity.
(2) A person who owes money or other fungibles for any other
reason may agree with the creditor that the money or the things
shall be owed as a loan.
§ 608. (Duedateof interest] If interest is
stipulated for on a loan it is payable, unless otherwise
provided, at the end of each year, and, if the.loan is to be
repaid before the end of a year, at the time of repayment.
§ 609. [Notice]
(1) If the time for repaymentof a loan is not fixed, its
maturitydepends upon the giving of notice by the creditor or the
debtor.
(2) The term of notice is three months in the case of loans of
more than three hundred Deutsch marks; one month, in the case of
loans of lesser amount.
(3) If interest is not stipulated for, the debtor is entitled to
make repayment even without notice.
§ 610. [Promise of loan] A person who
promises to make a loan may, in case of doubt, revoke the promise
if a serious worsening in the financial circumstances of the
other party comes about whereby the claim for repayment is
endangered.
SIXTH TITLE
Contract of Service
§ 611. [Essence of contract of service]
(1) By the contract for service, the person who promises service
is bound to perform the service promised, and the other party is
bound to pay ihe remuneration agreed upon.
(2) Service of any kind may be the object of the contract for
service.BOOK 2: § 631-634
SEVENTH TITLE.
Contract for Work
§ 631. [Essence of contract for work]
(1) By a contract for work the contractor is bound to produce the
work promised, and the customer is bound to pay the remuneration
agreed upon.
(2) The object of the contract for work may be either the
production or alteration of a thing, or any other result to be
brought about by labor or performance of service.
§ 632. [Remuneration]
(1) Remuneration is deemed to have been tacitly agreed upon if,
under the circumstances, the production of the work is to be
expected only for remuneration.
(2) If the amount of the remuneration is not specified, and if
there is a tariff, the tariff rate of remuneration, or, in the
absence ot a taritf, the normal remuneration, is deemed to have
been agreed upon.
§ 633. [Contractor's duty of warranty;
removal of defectsj
(1) The contractor is bound so to produce the work that is has
the promised qualities and is not affected with defects which
destroy or diminish its value or fitness for its ordinary or
stipulated use.
(2) If the work is not of such quality, the customer may demand
the removal of the defect. The contractor is entitled to refuse
such removal if it requires disproportionate oütlay.
(3) If the contractor is in default in respect of the removal of
the defect, the customer may himself remove the defect and claim
compensation for the necessary outlays.
§ 634. LFixing a period with threat of
refusal; cancellation; redudion]
(1) The customer may allot to the contractor a reasonable period
for the removal of a defect of the kind specified in § 633 with
a declaration that he will refuse the removal of the defect affer
the expiration of the period. If a defect has already appeared
before the delivery of the work, the customer may fix the period
forthwith; the period must be so calculated that it does not
expire before the period fixed for delivery. After the expiration
of the period the customer may demand the annulment of the
contract (cancellation), or reduction of the remuneration
(reduction), unless the defect has been removed in due time; the
claim for removal of the defect is barred.
(2) The fixing of a period is not necessary if the removal of the
defect is impossible, or is refused by the contractor, or if the
immediate enforcement of the claim for cancellation or reduction
is justified by a special i nterest of the customer.
(3) Cancellation is barred if the defect diminishes only
insignificantly the value or fitness of the work.
(4) The provisions of §§465 to 467, 469 to 475 applicable to
sale apply mutatis
§ 635. [Compensation for non-fulfillment]
(1)
Ifthedefectintheworkiscausedbyacircumstanceforwhichthecontractor
is responsible, the customer may demand compensation for
non-fulfillment, instead of cancellation or reduction.
§ 636, [Late Production]
(1) If the work is wholly or in part not produced in due time,
the provisions of §634, (1) to (3), applicable to cancellation,
apply mutatis mutandis; the right of the customer to rescind the
contract under §327 takes the place of the claim for
cancellation. The rights of the customer in the case of the
default of the contractor remain unaffected.
(2) If the contractor contests the perrnissibility of the
declared rescission on the ground that he has produced the work
in due time, the burden of proof is upon him.
§ 637. [Contractual exclusion of liability]
An agreement, whereby the obligation of the contractor as to
responsibility for a defect in the work is released or limited,
is void if the contractor fraudulently conceals the defed.
§ 638. [Short Prescription]
(1) The claim of the customer for removal of a defect in the work
and his claims for cancellation, reduction, or compensation on
account of the defect are barred by prescription, in six months,
unless the contractor has fraudulently concealed the defeci; in
the case of work on land, in one year; in the case of work on
buildings, in five years. The prescription begins to run from the
acceptance of the work.
(2) The period of prescription may be extended by contract.
§ 639. [Interruption and suspension of
prescription]
(1) The provisions of §477 , (2), (3) and §§478, 479,
applicable to the prescription of claims of a purchaser,
applymutatis mutandis to the prescription of the claims of the
customer specified in §638.
(2) If the contractor, by agreementwith the customer, undertakes
an investigation into the existence of the detect or of the
removal of the defect, the prescription is suspended until the
contractor informs the cüstomer of the result of the
investigation, or declares to him that the defect is removed, or
refuses to effect the removal.
§ 640. [Customer's duty of acceptance]
(1) The customer is bound to accept thework completed according
to contract, unless this is impossible by reason of the nature of
the work.
(2) If the customer accepts a defective work, although he knows
of the defect, the clai ms specified in §§633, 634 belong to
him only if at the time of acceptance he reserves his rights on
account of the defed.
§ 641. [Due date of remuneration]
(1) The remuneration is payable at the time of acceptance of the
work. If the work is to be accepted in parts and the remuneration
has been specified for the several paris, the remuneration for
each part is payable at the time of its acceptance.
(2) Remuneration specified in money bears interest from time of
acceptance of the work, unless a future time is fixed for its
payment.
ELEVENTH TITLE
Management without mandate
§ 677. [Duties of manager] A person who
takes care of some matter for another without having received a
mandate from him or being otherwise entitled to do so in ,
respect of him, shall manage the affair in such manner as the
interest of the principal requires, having regard to his actual
or presumptive wishes.
§ 678. [Management agairut wish of
principal] If the undertaking of the management of the matter is
opposed to the actual or presumptive wishes of the principal, and
if the manager must have recognised this, he is bound to
compensate the principa) for any damage arising from his
management of the affair, even if no fault is otherwise imputable
to him.
§ 679. [Disregard of theopposirvg wish of
pri~ipal] The fact that the management of the matter is opposed
to the wishes of the principal is not taken into consideration
if, without the management of the affair, a duty of the
principal, the fulfilment of which is of public interest, or a
statutory duty to furnish maintenance to others by the principal,
would not be fulfilled in due time.
§ 680. [Management to avert danger] If the
management of the matter has for its object the averting of an
imminent danger which threatens the principal, the agent is
responsible only for wilful conduct and gross negligence.
§ 681. [Accessory dutiesof manager] The
agent shall notifythe principal, as soon as practicable, of the
undertaking of the management of the matter, and await his
decision, unless there is danger in delay. For the rest the
provisions of §§ 666 to 668, applicable to a mandatary, apply
mutatis mutandis to the obligations of the manager.
TWENTY-THIRD TITLE
Production of Things
§ 809. [Inspection of thing] A person who
has a claim against the possessor of a thing in respect of the
thing, orwishes to ascertain whether he is entitled to such a
claim, may, if the inspection of the thing is of interest to him
forthis reason, require the possessor to produce the thing for
his inspection or to permit the inspection.
§ 810. [Inspection of documents] A person
who has a legal interest in the examination of a document in the
possession of another may demand from the possessor permission to
examine it, if the document is made in his interest, or if in the
document a legal relationship existing between himself and
another is recorded, or if the document contains the negotiations
of any legal transaction which have been carried on between him
and another person. or between one of them and a common
intermediary.
§ 811. [Place of production; risk; costs]
(1 ) In the cases provided for by §§ 809, 810 the production
shall be made in the place where the thing to be produced is
situated. Either party may require production in some other place
if a serious cause exists.
(2) The risk and the costs shall be borne by the person asking
for the production. The possessor may refuse production until the
other party advances to him the costs and gives security against
the risk.
TWENTY-FOURTH TITLE
Unjust Enrichment
§ 812. [Principle]
(1) A person who, through an act performed by another, or in any
other manner, acquires something at the expense of the
latterwithout any legal ground, is bound to return it tn him~
This o6lisation suhsistc PvPn if the leeal ernundBOOK 2: §
813-818 subsequently disappears or the result intended to be
produced by an act to be performed pursuant to the legal
transaction is not produced.
(2) Recognition of the existence or non-existence of a debt, if
made under a contract, is also deemed to be an act of
performance.
§ 813. [Fulfilment despite defense]
(1) What was done with the object of fulfilling an obligation may
be demanded back even if there was a defense to the claim whereby
the enforcement of the claim was permanently barred. The
provision of 222 (2) remains unaffected.
(2) If an obligation due on a certain date is fulfilled in
advance, the right to demand return is barred; the discounting of
interim interest may not be demanded.
§ 814. [Knowledge of debt not owed; moral
duty and duty of common decency] What was done with the object of
fulfilling an obligation may not be demanded back if the person
performing knew that he was not bound to effect the performance,
or if the performance was in compliance with a moral duty, or for
the sake of commorr decency.
§ 815. [Non-occurrence of
result]Therighttodemandreturnonthegroundsofthe non-occurrence of
the result intended to be produced bywhatwas done, is barred, if
the production of the result was impossible from the beginning,
and the person performing knew this, or if he has prevented the
occurrence of the result in bad faith.
§ 816. [Disposition by person without
title]
(1) If a person without title to an objed makes a disposition of
it which is binding upon the person having title he is bound to
hand over to the latter what he has obtained by the disposition.
If the disposition is made gratuitously the same obligation is
imposed upon the person who acquires a legal advantage directly
through the disposition.
(2) If an act of performance is done for the benefit of a person
not entitled thereto, which is effective against the person
entitled, the former is bound to hand over to the latter the
value of such performance.
§ 817. [Violation of law or public policy]
If the purpose of an act of performance was specified in such a
manner that its acceptance by the recipient constitutes an
infringement of a statutory prohibition or is contrary to public
poliry, the recipient is bound to make restitution. The claim for
return is barred if the person performing has committed a similar
infringement, unless the performance consisted in entering into
an obligation; what has been given for the performance of such an
obligation may not be demanded back.
§ 818. [Extent of claim of enrichment]
(1) The obligation to return extends to emoluments derived, and
to whatever the recipient acquires either by virtue of a right
obtained by him or as compensation for the destruction, damage or
deprivation of the object obtained.
(2) If the return is impossible on account of the nature of the
object obtained, or if the recipient for any other reason is not
in a position to make the return, he shall make good the value.
(3) The obligation to return or to make good the value is
excluded where the recipient is no longer enriched.BOOK 2: § 819
(4) After the date an action is pending the recipient is liable
under the general provisions.
§ 819. [Increased liability in case of bad
faith and infringement of law or public policy] (1) If the
recipient knows of the absence of a legal ground at the time of
the receipt, or if he subsequently learns of it, he is bound to
return from the time of receipt or of acquisition of the
knowledge as if an action on the daim tor return were pending at
that time.
(2) If the recipient, by the acceptance of an act of periormance,
infringes a statutory prohibition or acts contrary to public
policy, he is bound in the same manner after the receipt of the
performance.
§ 820. [Increased liability in case of
uncertainty of production of result]
(1) If a result was intended to be produced by an act of
performance, and if the production of such a result was,
according to the contents of the legal transaction, regarded as
doubtful, the recipient is, where the result is not produced,
bound to retum in the same manner as if an action were pending on
the right to demand return at the time of the receipt. The same
applies if the performance was made on a legal ground whose
disappearance was regarded as possible according to the contents
of the legal transaction, and the legal ground disappears.
(2) The recipient is bound to pay interest only from the time at
which he learns thatthe result has not been produced, orthat the
legal ground has disappeared; for the return of emoluments he is
nof bound insofaras he is no longer enriched atthat time.
§ 821. [Claim of enrichment] A person who
incurs an obligation without legal ground may refuse performance,
even if the claim for release from the obligation has been barred
6y prescription.
§ 822. [Third party's duty to return] If
the recipient transfers the thing acquired gratuitously to a
third party, and if in consequence of this the obligation of the
recipient for return of the enrichment is excluded, the third
party is bound to return the enrichment as if he had received it
from the creditor without legal ground.
TWENTY-FIFTH TITLE
Delicts (Tort)
§ 823. [Duty to compensate for damage]
(1) A person who, wilfully or negligently, unlawfully injures the
life, body, health, freedom, propertyorother rightof another is
boundto compensate him for any damage arising therefrom.
(2) The same obligation is placed upon a person who infringes a
statute intended forthe protection of others. If, accordingto the
provisionsof the statute, an infringement of this is possible
even without fault, the dWy to make compensation arises only in
the event of fault.
§ 824. [Endangering credit]
(1) A person who declares or publishes, contrary to the truth, a
statement which is likely to endanger the credit of another, or
to injure his earnings or prosperity in any other manner, shall
compensate the other for any damage arising therefrom, even if he
does not know of its untruth, but should know of it.
(2) A person who makes a communication, the untruth of which is
unknown to him, does not thereby render himselt liable to make
compensation, if he or the receiver of the communication has a
lawfiul interest in it.
§ 825. [Inducement to cohabit] A person who
by cunning, by threats, or by the abuse of a relationship of
dependence, induces a woman to permit extra-marital cohabitation,
is bound to compensate her for any damage arising therefrom.
§ 826. [Wilful damage contrary to public
policy] A person who wilfully causes damage to another in a
manner contrary to public poliry is bound to compensate the other
for the damage.
§ 827. [Exclusion and lessening of
responsibility] A person who causes damage to another person when
the former is unconscious or when he is suffering from a mental
disturbance preventing the free exercise of his will, is not
responsible for the damage. If he has brought himself into a
temporarv condition of this kind by alcoholic drinks or similar
means, he is responsible forany damage which he in this condition
unlawfully causes in the same manner as if negligence were
imputable to him; the responsibility does not arise if he has
been brought into this condition without fault.
§ 828. (Minors: deaf mutes]
(1) , A person who has not completed his seventh year of age is
not responsible for any damage which he causes to another.
(2) A person who has completed his seventh but not his eighteenth
year of age is not responsible for any damage which he causes to
another, if he, at the time of committing the damaging act, did
not have the understanding necessary for realising his
responsibility. The same applies to a deaf mute.
§ 829. [Duty to compensate for equitable
reasons] A person who in one of the cases specified in §§ 823
to 826, is not responsible, byvirtue of §§ 827, 828, for any
damage caused by him, shall, nevertheless, where compensation
cannot be obtained from a third party charged with the duty of
supervision, make compensation for the damage as is reasonable
under the circumstances; in particular where, according to the
relative positions of the parties, equity requires compensation,
and he is not deprived of the means which he needs for his own
reasonable maintenance and for the fulfilment of the obligations
imposed upon him by law to furnish maintenance to others.
§ 830. [Accomplices and participants]
(1) If several persons through a jointly committed delict have
caused damage, each is responsible for the damage. The same
applies if it cannot be discovered which of several participants
has caused the damage through his action.
(2) Instigators and accomplices are in the same position as joint
actors.
§ 831. [Liability for employees]
(1 ) A person who employs another to do any work is bound to
compensate for any damage which the other unlawfully causes to a
third party in the performance of his work. The duty to
compensate does not arise if the employer has exercised necessary
care in the selection of the employee; and, where he has to
supply apparatus or equipment or to supervise the work, has also
exercised ordinary care as regards such supply or supervision, or
if the damagewould have arisen notwithstanding the exercise of
such care.
(2) The same responsibility attaches to a person who, by contract
with the employer, undertakes to take charge of any of the
matters specified in (1), sent. 2.
§ 832. [Liability of persons exercising
duty of supervision]
(1) A person who is bound by law to exercise supervision over a
person who needs supervision by reason of minority, or by reason
of his mental or physical condition, is bound to make
compensation for any damage which the latter unlawfully causes to
a third party. The duty to make compensation does not arise if he
fulfils his duty of supervision, or if the damage would have
occurred notwithstanding the exercise of proper supervision.
(2) The same responsibility attaches to a person who undertakes
the supervision by contract.
§ 833. [liability of animal keepers] If a
person is killed, or the body or health of a person is injured,
or a thing is damaged, by an animal, the person who keeps the
animal is bound to compensate the injured party for any damage
arising therefrom. The duty to make compensation does not arise
if the damage is caused by a domestic animal which aids the
business, the earnings or the prosperity of the keeper of the
animal, and if the keeper of the animal has either exercised
necessary care in supervising the animal or if the damage would
have occurred notwithstanding the exercise of such care.
§ 834. [Liability of animal supervisors} A
person who undertakes to supervise an ani mal under a contract
with the keeper of the animal is responsible for any damage which
the animal causes to a third party in the manner specified in §
833. The responsibility does not arise if he has exercised
necessary care in the supervision, or if the damage wöuld have
occurred notwithstanding the exercise of such care.
§ 835. [Repealed].
§ 836. [liability for collapse of building]
(1 ) If, bythe collapse of a building or other structure attached
to a piece of land, or by the detachment of parts of the building
or structure, a person is killed, or the body or health of a
person is injured, or a thing is damaged, and if the collapse or
the detachment was caused by defective construction or inadequate
maintenance, the possessor of the land is bound to compensate the
injured party for any damage
arising therefrom. The duty to make compensation does not arise
if the possessor has exercised necessary care for the purpose of
averting the danger.
(2) A former possessor of the land is responsible for the damage,
if the collapse or the detachment occurs within one year after
the termination of his possession, unless during his possession
he exercised necessary care, or unless a subsequent possessor
could have averted the danger by the exercise of such care.
(3) The possessor within the meaning of these provisions is the
proprietary possessor.
§ 837. [Liability of possessor of building]
If a person in the exercise of a right possesses a building or
other structure on the land of another, the responsibility
specified in § 836 attaches to him instead of to the possessor
of the land.
§ 838. [Liability of person with duty to
maintain building] A person who undertakes for the possessor the
maintenance of a building or a structure attached to land, or who
has to maintain the building or the structure by virtue of a
right of use belonging to him, is responsible in the same manner
as the possessor for any damage caused by the collapse or the
detachment of parts.
§ 839. [Liability for breach of official
duty]
(1) If an official wilfully or negligently commits a breach of
official duty incumbent upon him as against a third party, he
shall compensate the third party for any damage arising
therefrom. If only negligence is imputable to the official, he
may be held liable only if the injured party is unable to obtain
compensation elsewhere.
(2) If an official commits a breach of his official duty in
giving judgment in an action, he is not responsible foranydamage
arising therefrom, unless the breach of duty is punished with a
public penalty to be enforced by criminal proceedings. This
provision does not apply to a breach of duty consisting of
refusal or delay in the exercise of the office.
(3) The duty to make compensation does not arise if the injured
party has wilfully or negligently omitted to avert the injury by
making use of a legal remedy.
§ 840. [Liability of several persons]
(1) If several persons are jointly responsible for the damage
arising from a delict, they are liable as joint debtors.
(2) If a person is liable under §§ 831, 832 to make
compensation for the damage caused by another, such other is also
liable; as between themselves, only the latter is liable, or =n
the case provided for by § 829, only the person who has the duty
of supervision.
(3) If a person is liable under §§ 833 to 838 to make
compensation for any damage forwhich a third party is also
liable, as between themselves only such thi~ d party is liable. '
§ 841. [Division of official liability] If
an official who, by virtue of his official duty, has to appoint
another to conduct a matter for a third party, or has to
supervise the conduct of such matter, or by his rätification of
legal transactions has to concur in them, is, where he commits
any breach of duty, liable jointly with such other person for any
damage caused by the latter, then as between themselves only the
latter is liable.
§ 842. [Extent of obligation to
compensate in case of injury to person] The obligation to make
compensation foranydamageon account of a delict committed
againstthe person extendsto thedetrimentwhich theactoccasionsto
his earningsorprosperity.
§ 843. [Money annuity or lump sum]
(~)
If,inconsequenceofinjurytothebodyorhealth,theearningcapacityofthe
injured party is destroyed or impaired, or there is an increase
in his needs, compensation shall be made to the injured party by
payment of a money annuity.
(2) The provisions of § 760 apply to the annuity. Whether, in
what manner, and to what amount, the person bound to make
compensation has to give security is determined according to the
circumstances.
(3) Instead of the annuity the injured party may demand a
settlement in a lump sum, if a serious cause exists.
(4) The claim is not barred by the fact that another person has
to furnish maintenance to the injured party.
§ 844. [Third party claims in case of
death]
(1) In the case of causing death, the person bound to make
compensation shall make good the funeral expenses to the person
on whom the obligation of bearing such expenses lies.
(2)
Ifthedeceasedatthetimeoftheinjurystoodinarelationshiptoathirdparty
byvirtue of which hewas or might be bound by law to furnish
maintenance to such third party, and if in consequence of the
death such third party is deprived of the right to claim
maintenance, the person bound to make compensation shall
compensate the third party by the payment of a monev annuity,
insofar as the deceased would have been bound to furnish
maintenance during the presumable duration of his life; the
provisions of § 843 (2) to (4) apply mutatis mutandis. The
obligation to make compensation arises even if at the time of the
injury the third party was conceived but not yet born.
§ 845. [Compensation for loss of service]
In the case of causing death, or of causing inj ury to the body
or health of another, or in the case of deprivation of liberty,
if the injured party was bound by law to perform service in favor
of a third party in his household or business, the person bound
to make compensation shall compensate the third party for the
loss of service by the payment of a money annuity. The provisions
of § 843 (2) to (4) apply muiatis mutandis.
§ 846. [Contributory liability of th~e
injured personJ If, in the cases provided for by §§ 844, 845
some fault of the injured party has contributed in causing the
damage which the third party has sustained, the provisions of §
254 applyto the claim of the third party.
§ 847. [Money for pain]
(1) In the case of injury to the body or health, or in the case
of deprivation of liberty, the injured party may also demand fair
compensation in money for nonpecuniary damage. The claim is not
transferable, and does not pass to the heirs, unless it has been
acknowledged by contract, or an action on it has been commenced.
(2) A similar claim belongs to a woman against whom an immoral
crime or
offence is committed, or who is induced by cunning or by threats,
or by the abuse of a relationship of dependence to permit
extra-marital cohabitation.
§ 848. [Liability for accident in event of
deprivation of a thing] A person who is bound to return a thing
of which he has deprived another by delict is also responsible
for the accidental destruction of the thing, or for accidental
impossibility of returning it arising from any other cause, or
for its accidental deterioration, unless the destruction, or the
impossibility of returning it, or the deterioration, would have
come about even if the deprivation had not taken place.
§ 849. [Interest on compensation money] If
on account of the taking of a thing its value, or, on account of
damage to a thing, its diminution in value, is to be made good,
the injured party may demand interest on the amount to be made
good from the time which serves as the basis for the estimate of
the value.
§ 850. [Compensation for outlays] If a
person bound to return a thing taken by him incurs any outlays on
the thing, he has the rights against the injured party which a
possessor has against an owner on account of outlays.
§ 851. [Making compensation to non-entitled
person] If a person bound to make compensation for any damage on
account of the taking or damaging of a movable compensates the
person in whose possession thethingwas atthe time of the taking
or damage, he is discharged by so doing even if a third party was
owner of the thing, or had some other right in the thing, unless
the right of the third party is known to him, or not known to him
by reason of gross negligence.
§ 852. [Prescription]
(1 ) The claim for compensation for any damage arisingfrom a
delict is barred by prescription in three years from the time at
which the injured party has knowledge of the injury and of the
identity of the person bound to make compensation, and without
regard to such knowledge, in thirty years from the doing of the
act.
(2) If the person bound to make compensation has acquired
anything by the delict at the expense of the injured party, he
is, even after the running of the period of prescription, bound
to return it under the provisions relating to the return of
unjust enrichment.
§ 853. [Defense of bad faith] If a person
acquires, by a delict committed by him, a claim against the
injured party, the latter may refuse satisfaction even if the
claim for avoidance of the claim is barred by prescription.
FIRST SECTION
POSSESSION
§ 854. [Acquisition of possession]
(1) Possession of a thing is acquired by obtaining actual power
of control over the thing.
(2) Agreement between the most recent possessor and acquirer is
sufficient for the acquisition, if the acquirer is capable of
exercising power of control over the thing.
§ 855. [Possessory servant] If a person
exercises actual power of control over a thing for another in the
latter's household or 6usiness, or in a similar relationship by
virtue of which he has to comply with the instructions of the
other concerning the thing, only such other person is the
possessor.
§ 856. [End of possession]
(1) Possession is ended by the possessor's relinquishing the
actual power of control over the thing or by his losing it in
some other manner.
(2l Possession is not ended by an impediment of a temporary
nature to the exercise of control.
§ 857. [Inheritability] Possession passes
to the heirs. § 858. [Unlawful interference]
(1 ) A person who against the will of the possessor deprives him
of possession or interteres with his possession, acts unlawfully,
unless the law permits the taking or interference (unlawful
interterence).
(2) Possession obtained by unlawful interference is defective.
The successor in possession must admit the defect against
himself, if he is the heir of the possessor, or is aware at the
time of the acquisition of the defect in the possession of his
predecessor.
§ 859. [Self-help by the possessor]
(1 ) The possessor is entitled to use force in defending himseif
against unlawful interference.
(2) If movable property is taken from the possessor by an
unlawful interference, he may retake it by force from a
perpetrator caught in the aa or in pursuit. (3) If the possessor
of a piece of land is deprived of possession by an unlawful
interference, he may, immediately after having been dispossessed,
recover possession by expelling the perpetrator.
(4) The possessor is entitled to the same rights against a person
who under § 852f2) must admit the defectiveness of possession
against himself.
§ 860. [Self-help by possessory servant]
The person who under § 855 exercises the actual power of control
for the possessor is also the person entitled to exercise the
right belonging to the possessor under § 859.
143BOOK 3: § 861-868
§ 861. [Ctaim on account of deprivation of
possession]
(1) If the possessor is deprived of possession by an unlawful
interference, he may demand the restitution of possession from
the person whose possession is defective relative to him.
(2) The claim is excluded, if the possession taken awaywas
defective relative to the present possessor or his legal
predecessor and was obtained within the year preceding the
deprivation.
§ 862. [Claim on account of interference
with possession]
(1) If the possessor is disturbed in possession by unlawful
interference, he may
demandfromthedisturberthecessationofthedisturbance.lffurtherdisturbances
are apprehended, the possessor may seek an injunction.
(2) The claim is excluded, if the possession of the possessor is
defective relative to the disturber of his legal predecessor and
the possession has been obtained within the year preceding the
disturbance.
§ 863. [Defenses of the taker or distur6er]
A right to the possession or to the carrying out of the act of
interference may be asserted against the claims setforth in §§
861, 862 only in support of the contention that the disturbance
of the possession is not an unlawful interference.
§ 864. [Extinction of claim for possession]
(1) A claim based on the provisions of §§ 861, 862 is
extinguished upon the expi ration of the year fol lowing the
occurrence of the unlawful interference, unless the claim is
previously enforced in legal proceedings.
(2) The extinction also occurs if, after the carrying out of the
unlawful interference, it is determined by final judgment that
the perpetrator has a right to the thing by reason of which he
may demand the establishment of a possessory status which is in
accordance with his manner of acting.
§ 865. [Partial possession] The provisions
of §§ 858 to 864 operate also for the benefit of a person who
is in possession of a part of a thing, in particular of living
accommodation or other premises.
§ 866. [Joint possession] If several
persons are in joint possession of a thing, there is in their
relationship with each other no protection of possession, in so
far as it concerns the limits of the use to which each individual
is entitled.
§ 867. [Right of pursuit of the possessor]
If a thing has passed out of the power of control of the
possessor on to a piece of land in the possession of another, the
owner of the land shall permit him to search for and remove it,
in so far as the thing has not been taken into possession in the
meantime. The possessor of the plot of land is entitled to demand
compensation for the damage caused by the search and removal. He
may, if there is apprehension that damage may ensue, withhold
permission until security is given him; refusal is not permitted
if there is danger in delay.
§ 868. [Indirect possession] If a person
possesses a thing as usufructuary, pledgee, usufructuary lessee,
lessee, depositary or in a similar relationship, by virtue of
which he is as against another, entitled orobliged for a time to
have possession, the other person is also a possessor (indirect
possession).
§ 869. [Rights of indirect possessor] If
unlawful interference is used against the possessor, the rights
set forth in §§ 861 862 belong also to the indirect possessor.
In case of deprivation of the possession, the indirect possessor
is entitled to demand the restitution of possession to the most
recent possessor; if the latter cannot or will not resume the
possession, the indirect possessor is entitled to demand that the
possession be yielded to him. Provided that the conditions are
the same, he may in a case falling under § 867 demand that he be
allowed to search for and remove the thing.
§ 870. [Transfer of indirect possession]
Indirect possession may be transferred to another by assigning to
him the right to claim delivery of the thing.
§ 871. [Multiple indirect possession] If an
indirect possessor stands in a relation to a third person in the
manner set forth in § 868 such third person is also an indirect
possessor.
§ 872.
[Proprietarypossession]Apersonwhopossessesathingasbelongingtohim
is proprietary possessor.
SECOND SECTION
GENERAL PROVISIONS REGARDING RIGHTS OVER
LAND
§ 873. [Acquisition by way of agreement and
registration]
(1) The conveyance of the ownership in a piece of land, the
encumbrance of a piece of land with a right, as well as the
transfer or encumbrance of such a right requires, to the extent
that the law does not otherwise provide, the agreement of the
person entitled and of the other party with regard to the
occurrence of the change of title and the registration of the
change of title in the Land Register.
(2) The parties are bound by the agreement before the
registration only if the declarations have been notarially
authenticated or given before the Land Registry Office or filed
with the same, or unless the person entitled has handed over to
the other party an authorization for registration in accordance
with the provisions of the Land Registration Law. .
§ 874. [Reference to authorization for
registration] At the registration of a right by which a piece of
land is encumbered reference may be made to the authorization for
registration for a more detailed description of the contents of
the right, in so far as the law does not provide otherwise.
§ 875. [Cancellation of a right]
(1 ) The cancellation of a right over a piece of land requires,
in so far as the law does not otherwise provide, the declaration
of the holder of the right, that he relinquishes the right and
the cancellation of the right in the Land Register. The
declaration is to be given to the Land Registry Office, or to the
person for whose benefit it is made.
THIRD SECTION
OWNERSHIP
FIRST TITLE
Substance of Ownership
§ 903. [Powers of the owner] The owner of a
thing may, to the extent that it is not contrary to the law or
the rights of third parties, deal with the thing as he pleases
and exclude others from any interference.
§ 904. [Emergency] The owner of a thing is
not entitled to prohibitthe interference of another with the
thing, if the interference is necessary for the avoidance of a
present danger and the damage threatened is disproportionally
great compared to the damage caused to the owner by the
interference. The owner may demand compensation for the loss
suffered by him.
§ 905. [Extent of ownership] The right of
the owner of a piece of land extends to the space above the
surface and to the terrestrial botiy under the surface. The owner
may not, however, prohibit interferences which are performed at
such height.or depth that he has no interest in their exclusion.
§ 906. [Interference from adjacent land]
(1) The ownerof a piece of land is not entitled to p; ohibitthe
intrusion of gases, vapors, smells, smoke, soot, heat, noises,
shocks and similar interferences emanating from another piece of
land to the extent that the interference does not or only
immaterially prejudices the use of his piece of land.
(2) The same applies in so far as a substantial prejudice is
caused by the use of another piece of land in conformity with
local custom and it cannot be prevented
SECOND TITLE
Acquisition and Loss of Ownership of Land
§ 925. [Conveyance of title]
(1) The agreement of the disposer and the acquirer (deed of
conveyance), required for the transfer of ownership of a piece of
land under § 873, must be declared by the parties in their
simultaneous presence before a competent authority. Any notary is
competent for the reception of the declaration of conveyance,
without prejudice to the.competence of other authorities. A
conveyance may also be decfared in a judicial compromise.
(2) A conveyance made subject to a condition or time stipulation
is ineffective. § 925a. [Documentation of conveyance] The
declaration of a conveyance shall be accepted only if the
document containing the agreement required under § 313 sent. 1
is presented or drawn up at the same time.
§ 926. [Acquisition of accessories]
(1 ) If the disposer and the acquirer are agreed that the
transfer is to apply to the accessories of the piece of land, the
acquirer acquires with the ownership of the piece of land also
the ownership of the accessory items existing at the time of the
purchase, to the extent that they belong to the disposer. I n
case of doubt, it is to be presumed that the transfer includes
the accessories.
(2) If the acquirer obtains, by virtue of the transfer,
possession of accessory items which do not belong to the disposer
or which are encumbered with third party rights, the provisions
of §§ 932 to 936 shall apply; as to the good faith of the
acquirer, the time of obtaining possession is decisive.
§ 927. [Proceeding of public notice for
exclusion of ownership]
(1) The owner of a piece of land may, if the piece of land has
been for thirty years in the proprietary possession of another,
be excluded, with his rights, by means of a public notice. The
duration of possession shall be computed in the same manner as
the period for acquisition by prescription of a movable thing. If
the owner is registered in the Land Register, the public notice
proceeding is permitted only if he is dead or missing and an
entry in the Land Register, which required the consent of the
owner, has not been made during the last thirty years.
(2) The person who secured such judgment of exclusion acquires
the ownership by causing himself to be registered as owner in the
Land Register.
(3) If, before the issuance of a judgment of exclusion, a third
party is registered as owner in the Land Register or if an
objection is filed on the grounds of the ownership of a third
party against the correctness of the Land Register, the judgment
is not effective against such third party.
§ 928. [Relinquishment of ownership]
(1) The ownership of a piece of land may be relinquished by a
declaration of relinquishment tendered by the owner to the Land
Registry Office and by registration of the relinquishment in the
Land Register.
(2) The Treasury of the [StateJ within the territory of which the
piece of land is situated, has the right to appropriate the
relinquished piece of land. The Treasury acquiresownership
bycausing itselfto be registered inthe Land Registerasowner.
THIRD TITLE
Acquisition and Loss of Ownership of Movable Property
I Transfer
§ 929.
[Agreementanddelivery]Forthetransferofownershipofamovablething,it
is necessary that the owner of the thing deliver it to the
acquirer and that both agree that the ownership be transferred.
If the acquirer is in possession of the thing, the agreement on
the transfer of ownership is sufficient.
§ 929a. [Agreement regarding unregistered
shipsJ
(1 ) Fu~ the transfer of the ownership of a seagoingvessel which
is not registered in the Ship Register, or of a part ownership in
such a ship, it is not required that delivery be effected, if the
owner and the acquirer have agreed to the immediate transfer of
ownership.
(2) Each party may demand that he be furnished, at his cost, with
an officially certified document with regard to the sale.
§ 930. [Constructive possession] If the
owner is in possession of the thing, there may be substituted for
delivery an agreed legal relationship between him and the
purchaser, whereby the purchaser obtains indirect possession.
§ 931. [Waiver of claim to delivery] If a
third party is in possession of the thing, there may be
substituted fordeliverythe owner´s waiver to the acquirerof his
claim for delivery of the thing.
§ 932. [Acquisition in good faith from
unauthorized person]
(1) By virtue of a transfer effected in accordance with § 929,
the acquirer also becomes the ownerwhen the thing does not belong
to the sel ler unless he is not in good faith at the time when,
by virtue of these provisions, he would acquire ownership. In
case § 929, Sent. 2 applies this however, is applicable only if
the purchaser had obtained possession from the disposer.
(2) The acquirer is not in good faith if he knows, or owing to
gross negligence does not know, that the thing does not belong to
the disposer.
§ 932a. [Acquisition in good faith of
unregistered ship] If a ship transferred according to § 929a
does not belong to the disposer, the acquirer becomes owner, if
the
FOURTH TITLE
Claims Arising Out of Ownership
§ 985. [Claim for delivery] The owner can
demand from the possessorthe delivery of the thing.
§ 986. [Objections by the possessor]
(1) The possessor can refuse the delivery of the thing if he, or
the indirect possessor from whom his right of possession derives,
is entitled to the possession as against the owner. If the
indirect possessordoes not have the authority as against the
owner to hand over the property to the possessor, the owner may
demand the delivery of the thing to the indirect possessor or, if
the latter cannot or will not accept the possession again, to
himself.
(2) The possessor of a thing, which in accordance with § 931 has
been transferred by the assignment of a claim for delivery, may
raise against the new owner the objections which are available to
him against the assigned claim.
§ 987. [Emoluments of the possessor]
(1) The possessor shall hand over to the owner the emoluments
which he derives after the date of filing an action.
(2) If the possessor after the filing of the action fails to
derive emoluments
whichhecouldderivefollowingtheprinciplesofpropermanagementheisobliged
to compensate the owner, to the extent that he is chargeable with
a fault.
§ 988. [Emoluments of gratuitous possessor
prior to filing of action] If a possessor, who possesses the
thing as belonging to him or for the purpose of enjoying a right
of use of the thing to which he is not actually entitled,
obtained the possession gratuitously, he is obliged to give up to
the owner the emoluments he derives before the date of filing an
action, in conformitywith the provisions concerningthe return of
unjust enrichment.
§ 989. [Liability of the possessor after
action filed; The possessor is, from the date of filing an
action, liable to the owner for the damage which occurs because
in consequence of his fault the thing becomes deteriorated,
destroyed or cannot for any other reason be surrendered by him.
§ 990. [Liability of possessor in bad
faith]
(1) If the possessor was not in good faith when acquiring the
possession, he is liable to the owner from the time of
acquisition according to §§ 987, 989. If the possessor
subsequently learns that he is not entitled to the possession, he
is liable in the same manner from the time of obtaining the
knowledge.
(2) A liability of the possessor on account of default remains
unaffected.
§ 991. [Liability of indirect possessor]
(1) If the possessor derives his right to the possession from an
indirect possessor, the provisions of § 990 in respect of
emoluments shall apply only if the requirements of § 990 are
present also in the case of the indi rect possessor, or if the
action against the latter has become pending.
(2) If the possessor was in good faith at the acquisition of
possession, he is nevertheless, from the time of acquisition,
answerable to the owner forthe damage indicated in § 989, to the
extent that he is responsible to the indirect possessor.
§ 992. (Liability of wrongful possessor] If
the possessor has taken possession by an unlawful interference or
by a criminal offense, he is liable to the owner pursuant to the
provisions concerning damages for delicts.
§ 993. [Liability of possessor in good
faith]
(1) If the conditions specified in §§ 987 to 992 are not
present, the possessor shall, pursuant to the provisions relating
to the return of unjust enrichment, give up to the owner the
fruits obtained, to the extent that under the principles of
proper management they are not to be regarded as proceeds of the
thing~ in other cases he is under no obligation to surrender the
emoluments or to pay damages.
(2) Regarding the time during which the emoluments are enjoyed by
the possessor, the provisions of § 101 shall apply.
§ 994. [Compensation for necessary
expenditures]
(1) The possessor is entitled to demand from the owner
compensation for necessary expenditures made on the thing. The
usual costs of maintenance are, however, not to be repaid to him
for the period during which the emoluments are kept by him.
(2) If the possessor, afterthe filing of the action or after the
commencement of the liability provided for in § 990, incurs
necessary expenditures, the obligation of the owner to compensate
is governed by the provisions concerning management without
mandate.
§ 995. [Compensation in respect of charges
on the thing] Necessary expenditures within the meaning of § 994
also include the payments which the possessor makes to pay off
charges on the thing. For the time for which the emoluments
remain with the possessor, he shall be compensated only for
expenditures for such extraordinary charges as are to be
considered as burdening the original value of the thing.
FIFTH TITLE
Parental Authority Over Legitimate Children
§ 1626. [Parental authority]
(1) The child stands under the parental authority of the
fatherand the mother as long as he is a minor.
(2)
Byvirtueoftheparentalauthoritythefatherandthemotherhave,unlessthe
following provisions otherwise provide, the right and the duty to
take care of the person and property of the child; the care
forthe person and property includes the representation of the
child.
§ 1627. [The exercise of parental
authnrityJ The parents shall exercise the parental authority as a
personal responsibility and by mutual consent for the benefit of
the child. In cases of differences of opinion they must attempt
to come to terms.
§ 1628. [Void: see decision of Federal
Constitutional Court, 29 July 1959] § 1629. [Representation of
the child]
(1) [Void: see decision of Federal Constitutional Court, 29 luly
1959.]
(2) The father and the mother are not allowed to represent a
child in a case in which representation of a child by a guardian
is disallowed under the provisions of § 1795; one of the parents
may, however, enforce maintenance claims of the child against the
other parent, if the parents live in separation. The Guardianship
Court may deprive the mother or the father of the representation
under § 1796.
§ 1630. [Limitation of parental authority
by appoiMing a curator]
(1 ) The right and duty of the parents to take care of the person
and property of the child does not extend to the affairs of the
child forwhich a curator is appointed. (2) If a curator is
charged with the care of the person or the care of the property